Oral Arguments are happening now. View them on the web or via Mobile App on iPhone / iPad or Android (4.0+).

You are here

Kotrous v. Zerbe

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Date: 
Friday, March 7, 2014

S-13-589, Jimmie Kotrous (appellant) v. Ryan Zerbe et al.

Knox County, Hon. James G. Kube

Attorneys:  George H. Moyer (Moyer & Moyer) for Appellant Jimmie Kotrous--- James P. Meuret for Appellees Ryan Zerbe and Ryan Camden

Civil:  boundary fence; implied contract

Proceedings below:  Jimmie Kotrous filed a complaint against Lyle Sukup, Kristen Sukup, Ryan Zerbe, Ryan Camden, and Farm Credit Services of America, generally alleging that he was owed half the costs of erecting a boundary fence. Zerbe and Camden filed a motion to dismiss, which the district court sustained and dismissed Kotrous’ complaint. Kotrous appeals.

Issues:  The court erred in (1) dismissing plaintiff’s claim against Lyle J. Sukup and Kristen A. Sukup; (2) dismissing Plaintiff’s claim against Ryan Zerbe and Ryan Camden; (3) dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

This page was last modified on Friday, March 7, 2014