Oral Arguments are happening now.View them on the web or via Mobile App on iPhone / iPad or Android (4.0+).

You are here

Harris v. O'Connor

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Date: 
Thursday, November 7, 2013

S-13-103, Keith Harris (Appellant) v. Robert O’Connor, Jr. (Appellee)

Douglas County, Judge Timothy P. Burns  

Attorneys: Thomas Wulff; Thomas Freeman (Wulff & Freeman, LLC) (Appellant); William M. Lamson, Jr.; Jason W. Grams (Lamson, Dugan, and Murray, LLP)

Civil: Malpractice action; appeal from order sustaining  motion for summary judgment.   

Proceedings below: O’Connor moved for summary judgment. The district court sustained that motion. Additionally, the court determined that the facts showed that Harris never told O’Connor to appeal and O’Connor never agreed to file an appeal. The court also disallowed “expert” evidence regarding a legal question.   

Issues: Appellant argues the district court erred in (1) finding O’Connor did not commit malpractice when he failed to preserve the record for appeal, (2) finding O’Connor did not commit malpractice when he failed to go back to the Board for rehearing or appeal to the district court, and (3) refusing to allow evidence from experts on the issue of legal malpractice.  

 

 

This page was last modified on Thursday, November 7, 2013