Oral Arguments are happening now. View them on the web or via Mobile App on iPhone / iPad or Android (4.0+).

You are here

§ 6-337. Failure to make discovery: sanctions.

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

   (a) Motion for Order Compelling Discovery. A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling discovery as follows:

   (1) Appropriate Court. An application for an order to a party may be made to the court in which the action is pending, or alternatively, on matters relating to a deposition, to the district court in the district where the deposition is being taken. An application for an order to a deponent who is not a party shall be made to the district court in the district where the deposition is being taken.

   (2) Motion. If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under Rule 30 or 31, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a), or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under Rule 33, or if a party, in response to a request for inspection submitted under Rule 34, fails to respond that inspection will be permitted as requested or fails to permit inspection as requested, the discovering party may move for an order compelling an answer, or a designation, or an order compelling inspection in accordance with the request. When taking a deposition on oral examination, the proponent of the question may complete or adjourn the examination before he or she applies for an order.

   If the court denies the motion in whole or in part, it may make such protective order as it would have been empowered to make on a motion made pursuant to Rule 26(c).

   (3) Evasive or Incomplete Answer. For purposes of this subdivision an evasive or incomplete answer is to be treated as a failure to answer.

   (4) Award of Expenses of Motion. If the motion is granted, the court shall, after opportunity for hearing, require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion or the party or attorney advising such conduct or both of them to pay to the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the order, including attorney fees, unless the court finds that the opposition to the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

   If the motion is denied, the court shall, after opportunity for hearing, require the moving party or the attorney advising the motion or both of them to pay to the party or deponent who opposed the motion the reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the motion, including attorney fees, unless the court finds that the making of the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

   If the motion is granted in part and denied in part, the court may apportion the reasonable expenses incurred in relation to the motion among the parties and persons in a just manner.

   (b) Failure to Comply with Order.

   (1) Sanctions by Court in District Where Deposition is Taken. If a deponent fails to be sworn or to answer a question after being directed to do so by the district court in the district in which the deposition is being taken, the failure may be considered a contempt of that court.

   (2) Sanctions by Court in Which Action is Pending. If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under subdivision (a) of this rule or Rule 35, the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following:

   (A) An order that the matters regarding which the order was made or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order;

   (B) An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or prohibiting him or her from introducing designated matters in evidence;

   (C) An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party;

   (D) In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, an order treating as a contempt of court the failure to obey any orders except an order to submit to a physical or mental examination;

   (E) Where a party has failed to comply with an order under Rule 35(a) requiring him or her to produce another for examination, such orders as are listed in paragraphs (A)(B), and (C) of this subdivision, unless the party failing to comply shows that he or she is unable to produce such person for examination.

In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to obey the order or the attorney advising him or her, or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

   (c) Expenses on Failure to Admit. If a party fails to admit the genuineness of any document or the truth of any matter as requested under Rule 36, and if the party requesting the admissions thereafter proves the genuineness of the document or the truth of the matter, he or she may, within 30 days of so proving, apply to the court for an order requiring the other party to pay him or her the reasonable expenses incurred in making that proof, including reasonable attorney fees. The court shall make the order unless it finds that:

   (1) The request was held objectionable pursuant to Rule 36(a), or

   (2) The admission sought was of no substantial importance, or

   (3) The party failing to admit had reasonable ground to believe that he or she might prevail on the matter, or

   (4) There was other good reason for the failure to admit.

   (d) Failure of Party to Attend at Own Deposition or Serve Answers to Interrogatories or Respond to Request for Inspection. If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails

(1) To appear before the officer who is to take his or her deposition, after being served with a proper notice, or

(2) To serve answers or objections to interrogatories submitted under Rule 33, after proper service of the interrogatories, or

(3) To serve a written response to a request for inspection submitted under Rule 34, after proper service of the request, the court in which the action is pending on motion may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others it may take any action authorized under paragraphs (A)(B), and (C) of subdivision (b)(2) of this rule.

   In lieu of any order or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to act or the attorney advising him or her or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

   The failure to act described in this subdivision may not be excused on the ground that the discovery sought is objectionable unless the party failing to act has applied for a protective order as provided by Rule 26(c).

COMMENTS TO RULE 37

 

   37(a) This section follows the federal rule and changes former Nebraska law by including requests to produce as proper for a motion to compel discovery. The language on imposition of expenses for unjustified discovery demands or unjustified refusals to comply with discovery has been changed from former Nebraska law to reduce judicial reluctance to impose sanctions. The former Nebraska section was Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25‑1267.43 (Repealed 1982).

 

   37(b) This section follows the federal rule and former Nebraska law, and adds to former law an explicit statement that a failure to obey an order may be punished as a contempt of the court. The former Nebraska statute was Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25‑1267.44 (Repealed 1982).

 

   37(c) This section follows the federal rule and changes the former Nebraska law to make it clear that expenses include attorney fees and to more fully define the conditions under which costs shall not be imposed. The former Nebraska section Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25‑1267.44(3) (Repealed 1982).

 

   37(d) This section follows both the federal rule and former Nebraska law, adding a provision allowing sanctions for failure to respond to a demand to produce under Rule 34 because that procedure now operates without an initial court order. The former Nebraska statute was Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25‑1267.44(4) (Repealed 1982).

 

Rule 37(c) amended July 23, 1997. Renumbered and codified as § 6-337, effective July 18, 2008.

Supreme Court Rules

This page was last modified on Wednesday, October 24, 2012