Dueland v. Dueland

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version

Dueland v. Dueland

Case Number
Call Date
April 12, 2017
Case Time
9:00 AM
Case Summary

A-16-0805, Mary Dueland v. Doug Dueland (Appellant)

Frontier County, District Court Judge David Urbom

Attorney for Appellant: Nathaniel J. Mustion, Lisa M. Shifflet (Mousel, Brooks, Schneider & Mustion, P.C., L.L.O.)

Attorney for Appellee: R. Bradley Dawson (Lindemeier, Gillett & Dawson)

Civil Action: Dissolution of marriage

Action Taken by Trial Court: The district court divided the marital assets, valuing the 401(k) plan as of the date of filing rather than the date of trial. The court awarded all marital debt to Doug and found that Mary did not dissipate marital assets. The court also ordered Doug to pay Mary attorney fees.

Assignments of Error on Appeal: On appeal, Doug asserts that the district court abused its discretion in (1) the division of marital property, specifically, in valuing the 401(k) plan as of the date of filing, in awarding all of the marital debt to Doug, and in not considering the dissipation of marital assets by Mary; and (2) awarding Mary attorney fees.

Case Location
North Platte
Panel Text
Moore, Chief Judge, Inbody and Riedmann, Judges