Stephenson v. Shoecraft

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version

Stephenson v. Shoecraft

Additional Case Names

10:40 am

Case Number
S-20-0142
Call Date
November 3, 2020
Case Time
9:00 AM
Court Number
Lancaster
Case Location
Lincoln
Court Type
District Court
Case Summary

S-20-0142 Ronald Stephenson (Appellant) v. Nicole and Jordan Shoecraft

District Court for Lancaster County, Hon. Andrew R. Jacobsen

Attorneys: Leslie E. Remus and Tony J. Brock (Brock Law Office, for Appellant);

Jarrod P. Crouse and J. Michael Hannon (Baylor Evnen. LLP, for Appellees)

Civil: Dog Bite Statute

Proceedings below:     After the district court determined that Appellant could not present evidence of previous incidents in which Appellees’ dog had bitten people, the jury entered a verdict in favor of the Appellees.

Issue on Appeal: Whether district court erred when it ruled that Appellant could not present evidence regarding prior incidents in which Appellees’ dog had bitten people and had been labeled as a “potentially dangerous dog.”

Schedule Code
SC